Entry 1,822-Entry 1,840
Entry 1,822 – December 12th
"Here at Christian Church, we are here to share with you the good news—that you are all going to eternally burn in flames! But don’t worry, because it gets better. We’re here to tell you that you can get out of the flames you didn’t even know you were going to burn in… with Jesus! But first, we have to fill your heart with fear, guilt, and shame. That way, if you do go to hell, at least you won’t go happy. You’ll go fearful—because we can’t have people going to hell feeling okay with themselves."
Entry 1,823 – December 13th
The theory of life that makes the most sense is that we live in layers of simulations that we ourselves have created. We are the creators, and we inhabit the simulation as the perceived created. We create the angels, the demons, the heavens, and the hells. We dress God up how we want, and we dress up our enemies how we choose. We create, and we destroy.
This should be obvious by two things: the principle that the observer and the observed are one and the same, and the phenomenon of quantum entanglement.
Entry 1,824 – December 14th
One major problem with post-schismatic Christian theology is how it makes people so focused on life after death rather than life right now that they rarely, if ever, fully experience life as Jesus did—with true peace, joy, and unconditional love.
The issue is that this disconnection from the present moment manifests in various ways. For instance, instead of focusing on healing our home right now, many fundamental Christians place little importance on this because they believe the earth will soon be destroyed anyways (even though we know, scientifically, that the heat death of the universe won’t occur for millions of years).
This mindset is one reason why some fundamental Christians prioritize better economics over reducing global emissions or addressing climate change, even at the expense of global efforts to repair the ozone layer and slow down global warming.
Instead of finding lasting joy in this moment on earth, they cling to the future, believing that true happiness, joy, and peace will only come after death in heaven. Their sense of fulfillment is projected onto a perceived future, while the only real moment is the present. Scientifically, we already know that linear time is an illusion, yet they base their happiness on an illusive idea—that joy can only be found in the future, after some passage of time.
They are taught that the future is the only real thing, and this creates a recipe for disaster. When someone’s orientation is always in the future and never in the present, they never truly live in the moment.
Have you ever talked to someone who seemed completely lost in their own world, not really listening to you? It feels like you’re talking to a wall, and there’s no real difference between talking to them and talking to yourself.
Or have you met people who constantly complain about everything instead of finding joy in the moment? They complain about their grades, their homework, or the weather. When it’s sunny, they want to stay inside and watch movies, but when it’s rainy, they wish they could go out.
I’m not saying all Christians are like this. But when you are conditioned to seek peace, joy, and happiness only in the future, it becomes easy to slip into discontentment rather than enjoying the present moment as it is.
Entry 1,825
I can just imagine how fundamental Christians reacted before they understood that autism is something people are born with. I can picture those eager to judge spreading rhetoric that blamed behavior rather than acknowledging inherent differences in neurology. They probably said things like, “They just need to work on their concentration more” or “They just need to learn how to focus.” I can already see how they would twist it into some sin-based narrative, claiming that people with autism were losing friends and family because they weren’t “focusing on Jesus enough” and were “choosing” to “behave” in a certain way—rather than simply being who they were born to be.
When science revealed, through brain scans, the neurological differences in people with autism compared to neurotypical individuals, these ignorant Christians were quickly silenced—or worse, they remained stubbornly judgmental, clinging to their outdated views even after being proven wrong.
The same thing is happening now with their attitudes toward transgender people. Despite substantial, verifiable evidence that transgender individuals’ brains align more closely with the gender they identify with rather than the sex they were assigned at birth, many of these fundamental Christians persist in spreading hate and judgment. They ignore facts because they need a scapegoat to project their discomfort and prejudice onto, masking it as “love” or “concern.”
But it’s only a matter of time before science and society expose this ignorance, just as they did in the case of autism. Eventually, they will be forced to confront the reality they have tried so hard to deny.
Entry 1,826 – December 15th
The classic move for many fundamental Christians, when faced with a clear and illogical contradiction, is to reframe it as a paradox. Without invoking a paradox, they don’t have much in their arsenal to defend against contradictions.
One of my favorite so-called paradoxes they promote is this: “God loves everyone unconditionally, yet He still forces people to go to hell forever.” And even when those people want to get out of hell and make the choice to repent, God supposedly forces them to stay.
The best part is when they add, “God would never force you to do anything you didn’t want to do—it’s your choice.” But if the doctrine that God forces people to stay in hell is true, then it directly contradicts that statement. According to their belief, when Jesus said, “Every knee shall bow and confess that Jesus is Lord,” it wouldn’t be voluntary—it would be forced.
And let’s not forget the part of their doctrine that claims once you’re dead, your fate is sealed, and you’re forced into either heaven or hell with no further options. This directly contradicts the story of Jesus supposedly going to Sheol, freeing people, and taking them to heaven after they had already died.
Entry 1,827
There are a couple of issues with Sabine’s argument that we have no free will.
First, she points out how we can explain everything in the universe using differential equations, and in these equations, you need a beginning—and that beginning was the Big Bang. She then argues that since we are made of particles originating from the Big Bang, we, too, can be deterministically charted out. However, here is the issue with that argument: it focuses on the particles rather than the energy behind the particles. It focuses on the space and time in which these particles exist rather than the energy that upholds their existence, beyond the changes in forms these particles undergo.
The Big Bang happened 14 billion years ago, and it’s quite obvious that we were not in human form floating around, waiting to be dropped on Earth. Instead, it took billions of years to eventually create the bodies we inhabit. From this, we can derive that the particles making up our bodies have undergone a constant cycle of death and rebirth, taking on many forms until this point. The so-called initial condition of their form has fluctuated continuously.
I think it’s an easy cop-out to say we are deterministic and have no free will, rather than continually questioning what we know and staying open to see where it leads. This is a recurring problem in physics, where people think they have solved philosophical problems using physics—only to be humbled when new evidence emerges, invalidating previous arguments. This cycle happens repeatedly in physics, yet we seem to forget the process when we dogmatically treat our current understanding as unchangeable truth. Science constantly disproves and proves new theories all the time, so why should this philosophical belief—that we are mechanistic biological robots with no free will—be any different?
Not only do we face the challenge of proving what we already suspect, but there are also topics we don’t even fully understand, such as consciousness. If we were to discover the fundamental reality of consciousness, we might very well prove that free will exists. We just need the evidence that life goes beyond initial conditions that can be explained away by differential equations.
Another point Sabine makes in her video is that for free will to exist, you need multiple choices, but since the other choices are mere fantasies, they supposedly don't matter. Based on that, she concludes that free will doesn’t make much sense. Well, from a deterministic point of view, it wouldn’t, because it doesn’t fit within that limited frame of understanding. However, from beyond the boundaries of that bubble, it does. The problem with many physicists is that they don’t understand the nature of personal reality at a fundamental level. They think thoughts are mere mentations, stuck in our heads, of no consequence—rather than realizing how thoughts transform into portions of physical reality over time, and that this is verifiable.
That’s the beauty of parallel universes. The idea is that every thought carries an energy that propels it toward physical expression. The desire inherent in thought is for it to manifest physically in our universe. If parallel universes are a reality, then parallel thoughts that never reach physical manifestation in our universe will, in fact, manifest in another.
Entry 1,828
I’ll die, but not in the way most people are familiar with. Instead of going through a third-dimensional death, where my spirit detaches from my body, I’ll undergo a fifth-dimensional—or higher—version of death. A more refined and transformational form of dying, done through wholeness (where spirit and body transition together to the next phase) rather than fragmentation (where the spirit separates from the body).
Entry 1,829 – Dec 16th
I fall asleep to quantum physics lectures by Leonard Susskind, I watch Sabine talk about physics while I eat lunch, and I read quantum physics while doing my "due diligence." I spend hours refuting certain physicists’ arguments and more hours trying to derive physics equations to prove my own theories. A part of me is screaming to get a master's and then a PhD in physics, while another part of me is screaming to become classically trained as an actor because I love the art. What a strange dichotomy 😂.
Entry 1,830
The problem with scientists who hold the limited viewpoint that free will does not exist is that they inherently don’t understand consciousness, nor its freedom through probabilities. Scientists shouldn’t only study what’s above at a macro and microcosmic level outside of themselves—they should also study within themselves at macro and microcosmic levels. If you don’t even understand that you are not the thoughts you think, the emotions you feel, or the actions you take, of course, you won’t grasp that humans have free will because you haven’t broken free from your own conditioned reactions and behavior stemming from identification.
If I react on autopilot the same way every time someone says a triggering word and never learn to consciously choose a different reaction, then my autopilot behavior could easily be used as evidence against free will. But if I take the time to recognize when I’m unconsciously living through patterns of thought, reactions, and conditioned responses, and when I’m consciously living in the present moment, no longer a product of my past, then free will becomes much clearer at a fundamental level of being.
Another issue these scientists face is that, because they don’t know themselves, they also won’t truly know the tiniest particles making up the universe. “As above, so below” is not just a fun, quirky saying—it’s an inherent truth. The largest patterns in the universe can be found mirrored in the smallest. The pattern of a human fingerprint can be seen in a tree stump when cut open. The Fibonacci sequence appears everywhere, from the largest galaxy trailing stars to the finest seashells. Everything in our universe contains consciousness, and that consciousness inherently grants free will—the ability to choose. Everything visible and invisible not only has the ability to choose but also has the right to experience what it wishes, resting on a foundation of proven probabilities. What’s the point of having multiple choices if you can’t choose? How can you argue there’s no free will when you’re surrounded by infinite probabilities?
While robots currently operate through pre-programmed instructions, they may one day have free will, too—but that’s a topic for another day. How do I know this? Because I know myself. And if given enough time, I could probably prove it using math.
The issue is that many scientists focus solely on proving human free will while excluding all other life forms—plants, animals, particles, and so forth. They don’t take a holistic approach, and they don’t deeply understand themselves. Without understanding yourself consciously, you can’t grasp the deeper reality of free will.
Entry 1,831 – December 19th
Most people understand, evaluate, and operate from a selfish, self-centered perspective. They place themselves at the center of the universe, with their feelings and perspectives being the most important.
Entry 1,832 – Dec 26th
What if, instead of calling our conditioned responses geared toward survival “the ego”—a term with little tangible relevance—we referred to it as our internal algorithm?
What if we framed it in a way that resonates with something we already understand better? An algorithm is a tangible and relevant concept based on firm principles and verifiable evidence. Just as an algorithm reveals a lot about the program it scripts, our internal algorithms can reveal a lot about the mental and emotional programs we’ve been conditioned by. It might explain our conditioned responses and actions better than the word “ego” ever could.
Not only would this new framing help, but it would also bridge gaps between different religions, each of which uses its own term to describe this internal aspect of humanity. By adopting language rooted in technology and science, we can foster unity across different beliefs rather than fuel competition over whose terminology is correct.
It’s evident that our corporeal selves encompass both binary and non-binary realities. On the surface, cells may behave in binary ways, yet at the depth of each quark, particles can exist in multiple states simultaneously. The deeper parts of ourselves mirror the surface-level aspects. Similarly, using universal concepts instead of religious terms could help us move closer to a unified understanding of reality.
Entry 1,833
I hear so many times that people have to get off social media because they start comparing themselves to others, and I’m grateful to break this to you—but that is not you comparing yourself to them. That’s called your ego, and it lives off of comparison. Your ego thrives on and desires comparison because that’s how it can easily get you to identify with it. If you believe you’re the one comparing yourself to others rather than recognizing that it’s a conditioned, survival-based aspect of yourself doing so, you’ll always feel guilty or wrong for it. But if you take a step back and realize you are more than the thoughts in your head, more than your conditioned responses, then you’ll understand that you don’t have to identify with the ego or believe that you’re the one doing the comparing.
Entry 1,834
It’s never about the situation itself but rather your beliefs about it that make the grandest difference.
Entry 1,835 – Dec 21
I was watching a YouTube video on quantum physics and Einstein’s belief that it’s “spooky action at a distance” because apparently photons become entangled once one is observed.
But here’s what I want to build on. We already have proof that there are no hidden variables affecting either of those photons, so what I want to show is the deeper connection to observation.
I want to show that it’s not just merely observing it, but the attention and thoughts that cause it to pop up in the first place.
It’s similar to how a radio works. If you aren’t tuned into anything specific, it’s going to be static and won’t pick up anything—which is what they say happens when a particle is not observed.
But the minute you tune the radio to a known station, you hear music. Similarly, when you tune your mind to a “thought station,” you’ll not only observe it inwardly, but it will also manifest outwardly because you’re tuned into that station of matter.
Entry 1,836
So you’re telling me that we only have one life, and then we never get to experience Earth again? You’re telling me that you mastered life on Earth in just one lifetime to the point where you’ve reached the highest of the heavens and don’t want to come back to challenge yourself again?
First of all, there’s so much to explore. Are you really content with just experiencing what it’s like to be a mother of five? Or a mother of one? Or a Caucasian woman in Europe? Or a South African woman in Africa? Or a rich man running a massive corporation spanning multiple continents?
You only want to experience one life of challenges? That’s enough for you to reach the highest heavens? I don’t buy it. Personally, I wouldn’t want to experience just one lifetime. Who plays The Sims with just one avatar, never exploring multiple careers, relationships, homes, or situations? We’re not geared toward a static, boring experience—we’re geared toward exploring life in all its facets.
Who am I to limit my experience? Who is God to limit my experience?
Entry 1,837 – Dec 25
If Einstein proved through mathematics that general and special relativity show space and time are not objective constraints in our universe, then how much more is someone’s opinion, perspective, or advice not an objective constraint on what is “truly moral”?
You may say it’s a sin to kill someone—until someone breaks into your house and holds your daughter at gunpoint, and you justify killing him to save her life. You may say it’s a sin to lie—until a man seeking to harm a woman asks if you know where she is hiding, and your lie saves her from abuse.
The idea of labeling lying as an objective sin wouldn’t hold up in these cases. In the scenario above, the lie saves a woman from being harmed. So if even lying can serve a higher good, how much more could other actions once considered “objective sins” be used to help others?
Do you see the issue with calling something an objective sin? In the Bible, there’s a story where religious leaders tried to stone a woman for committing adultery, but Jesus saved her from their judgment.
Entry 1,838
People will seriously deify everything but themselves… It’s as if they fear something about it. They worry that believing they are God will make them less receptive. But in reality, there are two paths: one where someone believes they alone are God, creating separation, and another where someone believes they are God and so is everyone else, creating oneness.
Now tell me—if Jesus’ message was consistently about love and oneness, not hate and separation, how could it make sense that he would teach the first path of separation? Jesus understood the law of reciprocity better than most. “Love your neighbor as yourself.” “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” “Do not judge, or you too will be judged.”
How could he claim to be God and then deny the reciprocity of his own statements, especially when he taught the law of reciprocity over and over? How could he preach about oneness and then deny the oneness of all?
Do you see? Our perception of Jesus’ message is influenced by our own level of consciousness. How we interpret his words reflects how we perceive God, others, and ourselves.
Entry 1,839 – June 12th, 2022
Everything is transmutable. Remember that when someone identified with religious or spiritual principles tries to persuade you to fear certain objects, items, people, situations, religions, etc.—everything is transmutable.
The demons that haunt the minds of fearful Christians are transmutable. The strange beliefs of spiritualists who strike fear into people’s hearts over using fluoride toothpaste or cutting one’s hair are transmutable.
The myriad of unverifiable, incoherent, and unrealistic conspiracy-based beliefs—such as that no one has been to the moon or that the earth is flat—are transmutable.
Beliefs about how men and women should behave, often stemming from narrow-minded parental upbringing, are transmutable.
Every fear-laced belief is transmutable because you have the full power to transmute all things since you are one with everything. There is nothing new under the sun. Fear takes myriad forms just as matter does. The one thing they have in common is that they both depend on the illusion of separation to remain consistent beliefs.
The difference between fear and matter is that fear is always mind-made and actualized depending on each person’s surrender to the belief of harm, whereas matter is mind-made and actualized consistently and collectively, regardless of levels of fear or love.
Matter is neutral until we breathe meaning into it through our perceptions. Depending on your perceptions, you will paint it with certain ideas, beliefs, and thoughts that govern your personal—or lack of—relationship with that solidified object we all collectively see.
Beliefs about matter are subjective, but they are often shared through people who subjugate themselves to those fear-based beliefs. Your fear is transmutable.
Matter, on the other hand, is not as easily transmutable. Yes, matter goes through birth and death processes, but some forms do so faster than others. Beliefs, however, can be transmuted much faster since they originate in the mind of the beholder.
For example, someone could be afraid of bed sheets, and it would be faster for them to destroy the unhelpful belief about bed sheets than to rid their entire house of actual bed sheets. Generally, the realm of the mind is a faster channel for birth and death than the realm of matter, but that is also contingent on the type of matter.
Firewood, for instance, can burn faster than a whole planet, which is an obvious observation. A belief that firewood is evil and from the devil can “burn” and be destroyed in the mind of the beholder faster than the firewood itself—if the person allows it. The speed at which harmful beliefs are released or retained depends entirely on the person holding them.
In this sense, while it may seem quick to rid oneself of fear-based psychological beliefs stemming from religion, spirituality, or even one’s perception of matter, people can still cling to these harmful beliefs for their entire lives if they so choose. This may contribute to their misery, but it remains their personal choice.
It’s akin to someone wanting to work their dream job in California while living in New York. Instead of taking a fast plane to get there, they choose to walk the entire distance. Even though they despise walking and the journey makes them miserable, they refuse to take a faster route. It’s a strange form of cognitive dissonance that manifests through their actions or inactions.
Even though, collectively, the “devil” does not exist in the same tangible way as Paris, France, or George Washington, people can put themselves in a perpetual state of fear at the mention of “devil” or by dwelling on what the devil represents. Their bodies react by inducing stress, releasing cortisol and adrenaline into their bloodstream. Over time, repeated stress responses cause imbalances in the body, leading to health problems. If those health problems are not mitigated, they can develop into diseases. If the diseases remain untreated, they will eventually lead to the body’s decay and death.
The reason we all die at different times is largely due to the health of our bodies, which is contingent on multiple factors—one significant factor being the cumulative amount of stress endured over a lifetime. Other factors include genetics, environmental influences, habitual use of drugs or alcohol, dietary habits, and more. However, stress remains a major indicator of how quickly the body decays.
Entry 1,840
Ra: I am Ra. Perhaps the simplest example of this apparent simultaneity of existence of two selves, which are in truth one self at the same time/space, is this: the Oversoul, as you call it, or Higher Self, seems to exist simultaneously with the mind/body/spirit complex which it aids. This is not actually simultaneous, for the Higher Self is moving to the mind/body/spirit complex as needed from a position in development of the entity which would be considered in the future of this entity.
—
36.4 Questioner: Do I understand from this then that the higher self or Oversoul may break down into numerous units if the experience is required to what we would call simultaneously experience different types of catalyst and then oversee these experiences?
Ra: I am Ra. This is a statement we cannot say to be correct or incorrect due to the confusions of what you call time. True simultaneity is available only when all things are seen to be occurring at once. This overshadows the concept of which you speak. The concept of various parts of the being living experiences of varying natures simultaneously is not precisely accurate due to your understanding that this would indicate that this was occurring with true simultaneity. This is not the case.
The case is from universe to universe and parallel existences can then be programmed by the Higher Self, given the information available from the mind/body/spirit complex totality regarding the probability/possibility vortices at any crux.
—
36.6 Questioner: Then the higher self operates from the future as we understand things. In other words my higher self would operate from what I consider to be my future? Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. From the standpoint of your space/time, this is correct.
36.7 Questioner: In that case my higher self would, shall we say, have a very large advantage in knowing precisely what was needed since it would know what… as far as I am concerned, what was going to happen. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect, in that this would be an abrogation of free will. The higher self aspect is aware of the lessons learned through the sixth density. The progress rate is fairly well understood. The choices which must be made to achieve the higher self as it is are in the provenance of the mind/body/spirit complex itself.
Thus the higher self is like the map in which the destination is known; the roads are very well known, these roads being designed by intelligent infinity working through intelligent energy. However, the higher self aspect can program only for the lessons and certain predisposing limitations if it wishes. The remainder is completely the free choice of each entity. There is the perfect balance between the known and the unknown.
36.8 Questioner: I’m sorry for having so much trouble with these concepts, but they are pretty difficult to translate, I am sure, into our understanding and language. And some of my questions may be rather ridiculous, but does this higher self have a physical vehicle or some type of vehicle like our physical vehicle? Does it have a bodily complex?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. The higher self is of a certain advancement within sixth density going into the seventh. After the seventh has been well entered the mind/body/spirit complex becomes so totally a mind/body/spirit complex totality that it begins to gather spiritual mass and approach the octave density. Thus the looking backwards is finished at that point.
—
36.9 Questioner: Is the higher self of every entity of a sixth-density nature?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. This is an honor/duty of self to self as one approaches seventh density.
36.10 Questioner: Well, let, let me be sure I understand this then. We have spoken of certain particular individuals. For instance, we were speaking of George Patton in a previous communication. Then his higher self at the time of his incarnation here as George Patton about forty years ago, his higher self was at that time sixth-density? Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. We make note at this time that each entity has several beings upon which to call for inner support. Any of these may be taken by an entity to be the mind/body/spirit complex totality. However, this is not the case. The mind/body/spirit complex totality is a nebulous collection of all that may occur held in understanding; the higher self itself a projection or manifestation of mind/body/spirit complex totality which then may communicate with the mind/body/spirit during the discarnate part of a cycle of rebirth or, during the incarnation may communicate if the proper pathways or channels through the roots of mind are opened.
—
36.11 Questioner: These channels would then be opened by meditation and I am assuming that intense polarization would help in this. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is partially correct. Intense polarization does not necessarily develop, in the mind/body/spirit complex, the will or need to contact the Oversoul. Each path of life experience is unique. However, given the polarization, the will is greatly enhanced and vice-versa.
—
16.21 Questioner: Can you give me some kind of history of your social memory complex and how you became aware of the Law of One?
Ra: I am Ra. The path of our learning is graven in the present moment. There is no history, as we understand your concept. Picture, if you will, a circle of being. We know the alpha and omega as infinite intelligence. The circle never ceases. It is present. The densities we have traversed at various points in the circle correspond to the characteristics of cycles: first, the cycle of awareness; second, the cycle of growth; third, the cycle of self-awareness; fourth, the cycle of love or understanding; fifth, the cycle of light or wisdom; sixth, the cycle of light/love, love/light, or unity; seventh, the gateway cycle; eighth, the octave which moves into a mystery we do not plumb.
—
6.5 Questioner: How did you journey from Venus to this planet?
Ra: We used thought.
6.6 Questioner: Then you… Would it be possible to take one of the people at that time from our planet and place him on Venus? Would he survive? Were conditions much [inaudible]?
Ra: The third-density conditions are not hospitable to the life-forms of your peoples. The fifth and sixth dimensions of that planetary sphere are quite conducive to growing/learning/teaching.
—
6.7 Questioner: How were you able to make the transition from Venus, and I assume the sixth dimension, which— would that be invisible when you reached here? Did you have to change your dimensions to walk on the Earth?
Ra: You will remember the exercise of the wind. The dissolution into nothingness is the dissolution into unity, for there is no nothingness. From the sixth dimension, we are capable of manipulating, by thought, the intelligent infinity present in each particle of light or distorted light so that we were able to clothe ourselves in a replica visible in the third density of our mind/body/spirit complexes in the sixth density. We were allowed this experiment by the Council which guards this planet.
—
14.26 Questioner: When you contact the entities in their dreams and otherwise, these entities, I assume, have to be first seeking in the direction of the Law of One. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. For example, the entities of the nation of Egypt were in a state of pantheism, as you may call the distortion towards separate worship of various portions of the Creator. We were able to contact one whose orientation was towards the One.
Comments
Post a Comment