Entry 1,510 - Entry 1,519
Entry 1,510 - November 12th 2022
Death has become my best friend.
Entry 1,511
The way that those on the right-hand path view those on the left-hand path is obviously skewed in favor of those on the right-hand path, or the path of deflection (right-hand), rather than attraction (left-hand). The right-hand path's whole claim to fame is rising above matter to Nirvana, rather than playing with and using matter while experiencing Nirvana.
The problem with the right-hand path of repelling matter is that we literally came to play in the world of matter. So a rejection of play is a serious issue regarding their goal of Nirvana. Plus, let's be honest—what's attractive about a self-proclaimed nirvanic religion that tells you that you must "resist your attraction to matter"?
Many who exclusively subscribe to the right-hand path say that, after a certain amount of time evolving along the left-hand path, people will eventually need to “turn around” and polarize toward the principles of the right-hand path, which is obviously biased and in favor of their path's efficacy. Maybe from their perspective, but not from all perspectives, hence why it is skewed.
The left-hand path’s strength is oftentimes marked as service to self or wisdom for one's personal progression rather than as a servant to religion. The benefit of this path is that they don't reject the matter they came to play in but accept it and have fun manipulating, changing, and creating with all forms of matter. Just like the right-hand path, they evolve toward the middle, which is marked by a sacred balance between service to self and service to others.
The right-hand path’s strength is service to others, and they also evolve toward the middle path, marked by that same sacred balance. They both evolve toward the other pole, but the goal is balance. The left-hand path emphasizes wisdom, and the right-hand path emphasizes corporate, group, religious, and community love in the form of service. However, at the end of the day, they both have love at the core.
Some people on the left-hand path are more balanced than others, but they do not lack service to others and/or love for the masses. Similarly, some people on the right-hand path are less balanced, but they do not lack service to self and/or wisdom. The left-hand path is wisdom/service, while the right-hand path is service/wisdom. Both are present on both paths, but one is oftentimes more emphasized in an entity's life. The left-hand and right-hand paths are simply meant to emphasize an entity’s strengths. They are not meant to be used to criticize, devalue, or judge.
Those on the right-hand path who see the left-hand path as dark, dreary, evil, and wholly selfish are projecting their own beliefs that stem from their own imbalance between service/wisdom from within. Similarly, if the right-hand path also sees their path as the only “good one,” the holy one, or the better one, then they are once again projecting their imbalance of service/wisdom by seeing wisdom/service as less, even though it is equal—just with a different emphasis, which produces different experiences unique to the left-hand path.
One is definitely not better than the other, for they are both manifestations of the One. To use an example separate from the branches of each path: Who says that the bad is fully bad and the good is fully good? Haven't those who claim to be “good” and do “God’s will” also used God as a justification to murder people?
Entry 1,512
The people who make the argument that you need a Guru, a religion, or a group in order to get to Nirvana faster, or to have the energy enter their body in a way that won't overstimulate it, are, in my opinion, making a joke of the process. It also shows that they do not fully trust themselves yet because they rely communally on a person who, more often than not, forms the next religion, group, or hierarchy of faith for that time.
By trying to say that you need a Guru to get to "Nirvana," they are essentially saying they cannot trust their own Higher Self to give them what they need. In my opinion, this points to a major defect in right-hand paths: They struggle immensely with trusting themselves.
Entry 1,513 - November 13th
If space-time is relative and linear time is an illusion, then how does it make any sense to project linear time as the ultimate and only reality for life after death? Those who project the idea that people are thrown into heaven or hell linearly and forever are logically inconsistent.
We already know that linear time is an illusion, but then these believers in the objective reality of linear time insist it is an eternal reality. This logically does not make sense. The problem is they are not equipped enough in the realm of physics to understand that their religious doctrines do not logically align with reality.
Religion can create both illogical and logical belief systems and still gather followers because it doesn’t require—and often discourages—followers from critically thinking and analyzing their centuries-old belief systems. This is another big issue with those on the right-hand path, who lead with love in the form of service for their religion, rather than love in the form of wisdom for personal spiritual progression.
Scientists can verify belief systems, let go of older ones that are disproven, and still not have an existential crisis. Since scientists don’t expect their beliefs to be handed down by an invisible god who will kill them if they don’t believe as their god commands, they have more freedom in their beliefs. When old beliefs and concepts are traded out for better ones, they continue their day just fine, knowing that this is what happens when one critically thinks.
Realistically, old belief systems are let go in favor of better belief systems that can be verified and are closer to the actual way things work, backed up by science. Not being afraid to critically analyze belief systems, doctrines, ideas, and concepts is a clear sign that you are no longer suffering from the fear of religion. Religion that discourages critical thinking does so to sustain power over you. If religion thinks for you, it still controls you. If you think for yourself, you are in control of yourself.
Entry 1,514 - November 13th
After reading the Ra material, it is obvious that they have their own preconceived opinions and judgments about those who are not on the right-hand path as they are.
From their limited perspective, because they are still entities on the path of evolution up the spiral toward oneness, they perceive those on the left-hand path as entities who will eventually have to “reverse” and choose the right-hand path.
Personally, I think this is a similar belief of inadequacy that is prevalent among those on the right-hand path. Those in Christianity, Islam, and Judaism all harbor the prevalent thought that their religion will bring them closest to God, and the other religions won’t do as well for people as their own. These Ra entities also have a similar viewpoint, seeing the left-hand path as inadequate and a reversal in one’s evolution as necessary, which, in my opinion, is hilarious.
I would say that both paths are working toward a balance. The left-hand path’s goal is to move toward the middle, just as the right-hand path’s goal is to move toward the middle. Yes, maybe from their outward perspective, the left-hand path entities are moving toward the right, but that is until they become balanced. Some may hop from one extreme to another, but eventually, the path up any side of the spiral is toward balance.
Since those on the right-hand path, bless their hearts, tend to lead from a place of imbalance around wisdom, they don’t understand the strands of connectivity that both sides share. When someone doesn’t understand something, it’s much easier to fear it, devalue it, or spread the belief that reversal is necessary because they believe, from their limited knowledge, that the other path is inadequate.
When one truly understands that a counterbalance doesn’t make sense, but moving toward balance does, they see both paths as valid expressions and experiences of the oneness of Source. There are selfish and selfless entities on both the left-hand and right-hand paths. Being on one side does not make one evil, nor does being on the other side make one holy. Both are experiences unique to the strengths and weaknesses that oftentimes accompany the entities on their preferred paths.
As tempting as it is to go down the path of the Ra entities—who still haven’t managed to leave their planetary system and who have melded so much that they don’t refer to themselves in an individual manner but prefer to be bunched into one label called “Ra”—I would much rather retain my unique individualized expression and explore the cosmos through the wisdom and knowledge I gain through my connection to the divine than experience that.
Entry 1,515
When I read Man’s Eternal Quest by Yogananda, it reminds me of what I grew up learning in Christianity for 23+ years of my life, but with a splash of Hinduism and new traditions added to the basic ideologies Christianity conveys.
There’s something incredibly boring about the right-hand path, especially when they use four hundred pages to say the same damn thing with very little to no variations in style or verse. Essentially, the same boring message that is repeated is “don’t desire sense objects” and “don’t want anything, including any sort of reward from the fruits of your labor.” It gives off a similar energy to this story I just pulled out of my armpit: I can tell a cow not to moo, but that doesn’t mean it’s not going to ever moo again in its life. It has a cow body, and its voice makes a moo. Why cut off a special and unique part of what makes a cow a cow by forcing it not to moo so it will “reach God”?
Similarly, this whole demonization and moralizing of the reality that humans are inhabiting bodies of matter that desire connection with other matter feels absurd. Why demonize this desire to experience matter within the confines of a materialistic body? How does adding morality to the process of experiencing life benefit the people who came here with the desire to explore life? Especially when we came here to specifically interact with sense-objects and other people using our human senses in order to experience others and ourselves in this special modality of life.
Entry 1,516 - November 13th 2022
Nikola Tesla’s benefit is that he saw humankind in terms of its nature, similar to how he saw his inventions through the scope of experimentation using physical principles.
Seeing humans as similar to inventions, he was able to systematize and understand inventions necessary for humans in a way that provided a basis for verifiable improvement.
If you have tangible evidence to support a point of view about a particular problem that needs a solution, you are bound to find a solution that brings you to a higher vantage point within that physical realm of reality.
The problem with numerous religions is that they try to solve problems from a non-physical reality built on the backs of beliefs that are sustained by nothing visible, not even clouds. These beliefs are so far from universally accepted reality that unless you were born into the religion and had enough exposure to it, it comes across as a fairy tale from another book.
People from that religion have to explain the names of their heroes and villains. They have to explain what their labels, jargon, and concepts mean. And the hardest part of all: they have to find a way to make these non-physical, fantastical ideas relevant and sensible, even though they inherently don’t make sense because they share the same energy as fairy tales. They try to take what exists in the realm of imagination and make it as relevant as physical reality.
Any religion that deters from accepted fact must rely on the followers' faith to sustain the non-physical realm of life it has created. Otherwise, if the people give up their belief in it, the fairy tale faith will dissolve along with it.
Entry 1,517 - November 17th 2022
Even if these right-handers are perfect in their ideology and "the goal of life" is to make it back to God, I bet a million that eventually, we'll desire to experience life through smoke and mirrors, different from how things really appear.
Entry 1,518 - November 18th 2022
The ego is like a computer system that grounds us in our current physical reality.
There are some egos that operate like old 2001 computer systems, even though it’s currently 2022. They rely on the 0/1 bit system to process information, which puts them in a predicament of the past. They might be able to synthesize and process a small amount of information, but too much can overwhelm their system. They might be able to open a few windows on Safari at a time, but too many could freeze their system.
They might only be able to handle one particular belief system about why we are here and explore all of its minor branches of thought in the form of doctrines, but they cannot go beyond the boundaries of that belief system because their ego is hardcoded from 2001. With this underdeveloped and outdated ego stuck in the past, it’s “us vs. them” constantly. There’s a constant impending threat that lives outside of them and beyond them. This threat is so powerful, it’s seen as a direct and threatening enemy of not only themselves but also God, further deifying and increasing the power of this threat in their life.
For it’s one thing for a threat to be their enemy, but to believe God has an enemy is to openly admit that God is experiencing a form of division much more intense, deeper, and dangerous than they are. The fact that they believe God has enemies at all is a result of their inability to see beyond the 0s and 1s, the black and the white. They project their idea of themselves having enemies onto God in the supernatural realm, and they can only handle that one point of view or belief system, which causes immense turmoil.
They see themselves as apart from nature, which carries its own issues. Their limited view of being apart from nature is held in place by limitation and division. For example, when nature creates storms, they might think that it was “God punishing them.” They either cannot or refuse to think beyond their one-sided belief system, which trickles into every part of their life where a belief may exist. This creates unnecessary assumptions that do not need to be made, which once again produces more unnecessary turmoil in their life. The ego that operates like an old 2001 computer system is a difficult ego to perceive reality with.
Then there are egos that operate like brand-new quantum computers. They not only process 0s and 1s but can process them simultaneously because the actual hardware reads organic bits based on the organic nature of the quantum computer. They don’t rely on outdated gates to process each bit, but they take full advantage of the organic nature of a qbit to read two of them simultaneously. This allows them to process information at an extremely fast rate. They are not only able to process quicker, but they are also faster at synthesizing information, analyzing, grouping, differentiating, and creating connections.
While the 2001 computer system was only able to handle one belief system about why we are here, the egos that operate like quantum computers are able to handle a multitudinous amount of belief systems and still not get overwhelmed. Since they can understand conceptually, intellectually, and intuitively the nature of belief systems, they understand that the actual weight of belief systems in life is similar to clothes. Beliefs are temporal; they are used to spice up physical reality, and they can be “worn” and “taken off” by the observer whenever the observer deems it is fit to do so.
This sort of ego is not only aware of the inner self that grabs from all probabilities that are waiting to emerge, like the bubbles on the bottom of a pot when the water is heated, but it is in constant communication with the probable realities it actively desires to choose. Because of that, there are fewer feelings of “the universe is going against my desires” and more of “I’m playing hide and seek as the universe while I’m here.” There is less separation and turmoil and more unification and happiness. When you know you are the computer and the computed—and so much more than both—that’s when it truly feels like a game with no strings attached.
The owner of the truly powerful computer system knows that if they were to die in one universe but had the desire to keep living and exploring, they would have their consciousness jump to another probable self and live on until they deem fit. They would have full assurance that they can find a way because, deep down, they know it’s their sandbox and, therefore, it’s their choice to do so or not.
Entry 1,519 - November 19th
Pleasure is not the enemy.
It’s our relationship with what gives us pleasure that creates perceived problems, which becomes the temporary enemy of our humanity.
“The ego is the tool by which the hidden self manipulates in the physical universe. In your case, it enables you to focus your artistic ability along lines necessary to make it effective on your plane. However, when the ego becomes involved with fears, it ceases to be an effective tool and becomes instead a hammer hitting you incessantly over the head.
When the ego becomes overly concerned, it becomes overly conditioned to negative responses. The creative energies build up their thickly-dimensioned pseudo-realities of pain. For a certain amount of time, according to your condition, they automatically create the patterns of fear that belong to the ego.These fears do not belong to what you think of as the subconscious. Then these materializations of panic and pain play about the physical body, projected by the ego, and steal the powers of the subconscious mind from their natural constructive tasks.… In other words, the ego becomes a tool to disrupt rather than to create.
Your own subconscious is the fountain of your individuality and personality; from it springs your talent. When the ego becomes too concerned with daily matters, with worry, then it becomes far less effective.”
Excerpt From: Roberts, Jane. “Seth, Dreams and Projections of Consciousness.” Seth Material, 1986. Apple Books.
Comments
Post a Comment